Guns

The obvious solution to the murderous atmosphere in our cities is the banning of hand guns. Illegal hand guns can be concealed and trafficked easily. In the hands of a criminal or a drunk, a hand gun is simply a murder waiting to happen.

Our politicians are gutless on this issue. They readily bow to pressure from the gun industry, represented covertly by the NRA, which shouts constitutional protection at every attempt to curb gun violence. The huge traffic in illegal guns brings profit to the gun industry. No rational opponent of illegal hand guns will attack the right of citizens to own a rifle for protection of his/her home or for sport. Yet, the NRA rabidly resists any moderate measures to stop street violence in our cities.

As long as our public policy is determined by profit motives of individuals and corporations, we will be denied the safety and health we deserve as human beings. This is a key difference between progressive thinkers and conservatives. Conservatives are so obsessed with holding on to what they have that they are unable to honestly look at what they and their fellow human beings need.

Comments

  1. This is a thoughtful essay, Paul. But I have to disagree. You might be right with respect to heavily populated areas, but when I lived in Montana, I knew a number of towns where police were more than 30 minutes away. What does one do in the case of a home invasion if calling the police won't bring help for half an hour? Unfortunately, not all parts of this country are evenly protected by police, so for those Americans living in small towns with no police presence, firearms are an absolute necessity.

    - John Figdor

    ReplyDelete
  2. John:

    Thanks for commenting. Sorry for the delayed response.

    I did indicate in the piece that most hand gun opponents do not oppose the ownership of a rifle for protection or sport. I personally am a nonviolent pacifist, so I would surrender any material possession to prevent violence, if confronted with a gun. When I have disarmed an armed person in the past, which I have done a handful of times, I have done so to protect an innocent person's life. Only once did I have to use force to do it.

    I don't prescribe this latter approach as a humanist value, but I consider it one of mine.

    Paul

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts